Epclusa® (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir)
Coadministration with Proton Pump Inhibitors
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is providing this document to you, a US Healthcare Professional, in response to your unsolicited request for medical information.
Epclusa® (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir)
Coadministration With Proton Pump Inhibitors
Some data may be outside of the US FDA-approved prescribing information. In providing this data, Gilead Sciences, Inc. is not making any representation as to its clinical relevance or to the use of any Gilead product(s). For information about the approved conditions of use of any Gilead drug product, please consult the FDA-approved prescribing information.
The full indication, important safety information, and boxed warnings are available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/liver-disease/epclusa/epclusa_pi.
Summary
Coadministration of SOF/VEL with omeprazole or other PPIs is not recommended. If it is considered medically necessary to coadminister, SOF/VEL should be administered with food and taken 4 hours before omeprazole 20 mg. Use with other PPIs has not been studied.
Clinical and RWD on SOF/VEL Coadministration With PPIs
A retrospective analysis of 12 RCTs and RWD assessed the relationship between SVR12 and PPI use in patients receiving SOF/VEL ± PPI (N=5769). The overall SVR12 rates in each group were comparable with and without use of PPIs, with 97% of the RCT group and 99% of the RWD group achieving SVR12.2
A retrospective cohort study found PPI use was not significantly associated with SVR achievement when compared to no PPI use (P=0.087). However, a post hoc analysis found that the SVR rate was significantly lower in patients who received either high-dose or twice‑daily dosing of PPIs than in the overall study population (P=0.001 and P<0.0001, respectively).3
A large, real-world cohort study evaluated the use of SOF/VEL ± RBV, including patients with concomitant PPI use. The SVR12 rate in patients who were receiving concomitant PPIs (n=354) was 95.5%, which was not significantly different than the 97.8% rate reported in patients who were not receiving PPIs (n=622; P=0.48).4
Clinical and RWD on SOF/VEL Coadministration With PPIs
Pooled Analysis of RCTs and RWD
Study design and demographics
A retrospective pooled analysis that included 12 phase 2/3 clinical trials across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia and RWD from 12 clinical practice cohorts across North America and Europe was conducted to assess the clinical relationship between SVR12 and PPI use in patients treated with 12 weeks of SOF/VEL for HCV. The main outcome measures included the rates of both SVR12 and relapse among patients receiving SOF/VEL ± PPI.2
The baseline demographics and disease characteristics among PPI users in the RCT population (n=87) were the following: mean (range) age, 57 (26–78) years; male, n=69 (79%); cirrhosis, n=32 (37%); and HCV GT 3, n=49 (56%). Those among PPI users in the RWD population (n=481) were the following: mean (range) age, 63 (25–90); male, n=258 (54%); cirrhosis, n=141 (29%); and HCV GT 3, n=118 (25%).2
Results2
Sixty-six percent of PPI-using patients (57/87) enrolled in the RCTs received PPIs during the 12‑week duration of SOF/VEL treatment; 68% of those who used a PPI used omeprazole. The overall SVR12 rates in each group were comparable with and without PPIs, with 97% of the RCT group and 99% of the RWD group achieving SVR12 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. SVR12 Rates by RCT and RWD Populations (Buti et al)2
Among patients receiving SOF/VEL + PPI, 3 patients did not achieve SVR12; 2 patients relapsed, and 1 patient with a history of diabetes discontinued SOF/VEL after 7 days of treatment due to hyperglycemia.
Safety data were not reported.
Retrospective Study on SOF/VEL With High-Dose or Twice‑Daily PPIs3
Study design and demographics
A retrospective cohort study from 128 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers across the US evaluated the impact of PPI use in patients who were concomitantly treated with SOF/VEL. Patients were included in the analysis if they received a full course of SOF/VEL (defined as 77–91 days SOF/VEL therapy received within an 84-day period [SD, ±7 days]) and had HCV RNA laboratory results within an appropriate timeframe after completion of treatment. Patients were excluded if their race, baseline cirrhosis status, or HCV GT was unknown and if another direct-acting antiviral was previously utilized for HCV treatment. This study did not differentiate between virological failure or relapse vs HCV re-infection.
The primary endpoint was SVR, defined as undetectable HCV RNA ≥10 weeks after SOF/VEL treatment completion. A post hoc analysis was conducted and included the following variables to describe PPI exposure: PPI prescription (yes or no); the PPI drug administered; dose frequency (once, twice, or three times daily); and low‑dose (20 mg omeprazole daily or equivalent) or high‑dose PPI (>20 mg omeprazole equivalents daily).
Table 1. Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics (Rumph et al)3
Key Demographics and Characteristics | With Concomitant PPI (n=830) | Without Concomitant PPI (n=3178) | ||
Age, median (IQR), years | 63 (59–67) | 62 (58–66) | 0.0007 | |
Male, n (%) | 807 (97.2) | 3040 (95.7) | 0.04 | |
African American, n (%) | 107 (12.9) | 440 (13.9) | 0.48 | |
Cirrhosis,a n (%) | 215 (25.9) | 687 (21.6) | 0.008 | |
GT, n (%) | 1a | 48 (5.8) | 153 (4.8) | 0.103 |
1b | 9 (1.1) | 23 (0.7) | – | |
2 | 469 (56.5) | 1737 (54.7) | – | |
3 | 273 (32.9) | 1176 (37) | – | |
4, 5, 6, or mixed | 31 (3.7) | 89 (2.8) | – |
aDefined as a Fibrosis-4 score >3.25.
Results
Of the 4008 patients included in the analysis, 97.7% achieved SVR. The SVR rate for patients with or without concomitant PPI use was 96.7% and 97.9%, respectively (P=0.045).
When adjusted for other variables using a full logistic model, PPI use was not significantly associated with a decreased SVR achievement (OR=0.67; P=0.087). According to the adjusted model, the only independent variables that had a statistically significant effect on SVR were a BMI >30 kg/m2 (OR=0.52; P=0.002) and the presence of cirrhosis (OR=0.48; P=0.001).
The post hoc analysis demonstrated the SVR rate was significantly lower in patients who received either high-dose or twice-daily dosing of PPIs than in the overall study population (97.7%; P=0.001 and P<0.0001, respectively).
Table 2. Post Hoc Analysis of the Effect of PPI Exposure on SVR (Rumph et al)3
Category | n | SVR, n (%) | SVR 95% CI | P-Valuea | Adjusted P-Valueb |
Total sample | 4008 | 3915 (97.7) | – | – | – |
PPI use - no | 3178 | 3112 (97.9) | 97.4–98.4 | 0.4 | 1 |
PPI use - yes | 830 | 803 (96.7) | 95.3–97.7 | 0.067 | 0.4 |
Omeprazole | 703 | 682 (97) | 95.5–98 | 0.22 | 1 |
Pantoprazole | 125 | 120 (96) | 91–98.3 | 0.2 | 1 |
Lansoprazolec | 1 | 1 | – | – | – |
Esomeprazolec | 1 | 0 | – | – | – |
Once daily | 667 | 653 (97.9) | 96.5–98.7 | 0.73 | 1 |
Twice daily | 162 | 149 (92) | 86.8–95.3 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Three times dailyc | 1 | 1 | – | – | – |
Low dose | 598 | 585 (97.8) | 96.3–98.7 | 0.84 | 1 |
High dose | 232 | 218 (94) | 90.1–96.4 | 0.0001 | 0.001 |
aThe unadjusted P-value is associated with probability that the category SVR was equal to the SVR probability for the entire cohort (3915/4008; 97.7%).
bHolm-adjusted P-value for multiple testing.
cNot tested for statistical significance.
Italian Real-World Cohort4
Study design and demographics
A large Italian, real-world cohort evaluated the safety and effectiveness of 12 weeks of treatment with SOF/VEL ± RBV in 1429 patients who had data in the Puglia registry between June 2017 and May 2018. At the time of analysis, 1319 patients (92%) had reached the 12-week post-treatment assessment time point and had the following baseline demographics and disease characteristics: mean age, 64 years; male, 59%; treatment naïve, 80%; fibrosis stages, F0–1/2/3/4, 25%/30%/23%/21%; HCV GT 1/2/3/4/5/6, 42%/39%/15%/3%/0%/<1%; and mean Fibrosis-4 score, 3.05. Fifty-three percent of patients (n=697) were receiving PPIs at baseline.
Efficacy
The overall ITT SVR12 rate was 99% (1299/1319). Of the 697 patients who were on PPIs at baseline, 354 (51%) continued treatment and achieved SVR12 at a rate of 95.5%; the SVR12 rate among those who did not use PPI at baseline was 97.8% (P=0.48).
Of patients in the overall study population who did not achieve SVR12 (n=20), 8 patients relapsed (2 of whom were reinfected), 7 patients discontinued treatment early, and 5 patients were lost to follow-up.
Safety
Any-grade AEs were experienced by 76% of patients (n=969) in the SOF/VEL group and 73% of patients (n=30) in the SOF/VEL + RBV group. AEs that occurred in ≥5% of patients in the SOF/VEL and SOF/VEL + RBV groups were fatigue (n=907 [71%] and n=36 [88%], respectively), headache (n=881 [69%] and n=34 [83%]), nausea (n=830 [65%] and n=24 [59%]), anemia (n=5 [<1%] and n=13 [32%]), and diarrhea (n=40 [3%] and n=11 [27%]). SAEs were experienced by 1% of patients (n=18) in the SOF/VEL group and 2% of patients (n=1) in the SOF/VEL + RBV group. No SAEs were deemed related to treatment in either group, and no AEs led to treatment discontinuation.
References
1. Enclosed. Gilead Sciences Inc, EPCLUSA® (sofosbuvir and velpatasvir) tablets, for oral use. US Prescribing Information. Foster City, CA.
4. Mangia A, Piazzolla V, Giannelli A, et al. SVR12 Rates Higher Than 99% After Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Combination in HCV Infected Patients with F0-F1 Fibrosis Stage: A Real World Experience. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0215783. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31091254
Abbreviations
Page 1 of 6
AE=adverse event
GT=genotype
OR=odds ratio
PPI=proton pump inhibitor
RBV=ribavirin
RCT=randomized controlled trial
RWD=real-world data
SAE=serious adverse event
SOF=sofosbuvir
SVR=sustained virologic response
SVR12=sustained virologic response 12 weeks after end of treatment
VEL=velpatasvir
Product Label
For the full indication, important safety information, and boxed warning(s), please refer to the Epclusa US Prescribing Information available at:
www.gilead.com/-/media/files/pdfs/medicines/liver-disease/epclusa/epclusa_pi.
Follow-Up
For any additional questions, please contact Gilead Medical Information at:
☎1‐866‐MEDI‐GSI (1‐866‐633‐4474) or www.askgileadmedical.com
Adverse Event Reporting
Please report all adverse events to:
Gilead Global Patient Safety ☎ 1-800-445-3235, option 3 or
www.gilead.com/utility/contact/report-an-adverse-event
FDA MedWatch Program by ☎ 1-800-FDA-1088 or MedWatch, FDA, 5600 Fishers Ln, Rockville, MD 20852 or www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch
Data Privacy
The Medical Information service at Gilead Sciences may collect, store, and use your personal information to provide a response to your medical request. We may share your information with other Gilead Sciences colleagues to ensure that your request is addressed appropriately. If you report an adverse event or concern about the quality of a Gilead or Kite product, we will need to use the information you have given us in order to meet our regulatory requirements in relation to the safety of our medicines.
It may be necessary for us to share your information with Gilead’s affiliates, business partners, service providers, and regulatory authorities located in countries besides your own. Gilead Sciences has implemented measures to protect the personal information you provide. Please see the Gilead Privacy Statement (www.gilead.com/privacy-statements) for more information about how Gilead handles your personal information and your rights. If you have any further questions about the use of your personal information, please contact privacy@gilead.com.
EPCLUSA, GILEAD, and the GILEAD logo are registered trademarks of Gilead Sciences, Inc., or its related companies.
© 2018 Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Page 1 of 6